Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 6129 for li.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 6129 for li.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the sentence would have arguable merit. Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128637 - 2017-09-21
to the sentence would have arguable merit. Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128637 - 2017-09-21
Converse and Lovina Smith v. Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study, Inc.
. The parties do not dispute the underlying facts. Their disagreement lies in the board's application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11552 - 2005-03-31
. The parties do not dispute the underlying facts. Their disagreement lies in the board's application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11552 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 03, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
have lied to me when I did defense work, and I know that ticked me off more than a client who thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27613 - 2007-01-02
have lied to me when I did defense work, and I know that ticked me off more than a client who thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27613 - 2007-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the delay is excessive and the reason for the delay lies solely with the State, prejudice can exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38501 - 2009-07-28
of the delay is excessive and the reason for the delay lies solely with the State, prejudice can exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38501 - 2009-07-28
State v. Matthew T. Doughty
. Sentencing lies within the discretion of the circuit court. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 681, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31
. Sentencing lies within the discretion of the circuit court. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 681, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary J. Hazen
). Determining whether a manifest injustice has occurred lies within the trial court’s discretion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2770 - 2017-09-19
). Determining whether a manifest injustice has occurred lies within the trial court’s discretion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2770 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Douglas A. Lisney
that he had lied to the police when they first questioned him and also told them initially that no one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3179 - 2017-09-19
that he had lied to the police when they first questioned him and also told them initially that no one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3179 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 540 (Ct. App. 1994). The “ultimate responsibility” for making findings lies with DHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
N.W.2d 540 (Ct. App. 1994). The “ultimate responsibility” for making findings lies with DHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
‘to refrain from prosecuting’ this case criminally. ¶14 Herein lies a fundamental problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134124 - 2015-02-02
‘to refrain from prosecuting’ this case criminally. ¶14 Herein lies a fundamental problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134124 - 2015-02-02
City of Whitewater v. Jeffrey L. Wyczawski
The admissibility of the evidence lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Pepin, 110 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3717 - 2005-03-31
The admissibility of the evidence lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Pepin, 110 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3717 - 2005-03-31