Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with convictions for the same act, “we look to the underlying actions, the ‘thing done’ or the ‘deed’ that gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072098 - 2026-02-03
with convictions for the same act, “we look to the underlying actions, the ‘thing done’ or the ‘deed’ that gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072098 - 2026-02-03
WI App 135 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3036 Complete Title of ...
against Brenda Landa is superior to U.S. Bank’s first mortgage with Landa, as the register of deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69581 - 2011-09-27
against Brenda Landa is superior to U.S. Bank’s first mortgage with Landa, as the register of deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69581 - 2011-09-27
[PDF]
State v. Penny P. Skaife
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
State v. Penny P. Skaife
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
State v. Douglas Maug
)(a), Stats. In fact, Maug pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. In fact, Maug pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Maug
pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7896 - 2017-09-19
pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7896 - 2017-09-19
State v. Edward J. Kuchinskas
on Kuchinskas’s breath. He also noticed Kuchinskas was stumbling quite a bit. Ratajczyk asked the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6265 - 2005-03-31
on Kuchinskas’s breath. He also noticed Kuchinskas was stumbling quite a bit. Ratajczyk asked the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Artie L. Terrell
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
On January 24, 2012, Harris filed a postconviction motion to modify his sentence.1 As noted, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90237 - 2014-09-15
On January 24, 2012, Harris filed a postconviction motion to modify his sentence.1 As noted, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90237 - 2014-09-15