Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Artie L. Terrell
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10851 - 2017-09-20
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10851 - 2017-09-20
State v. Artie L. Terrell
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward J. Kuchinskas
on Kuchinskas’s breath. He also noticed Kuchinskas was stumbling quite a bit. Ratajczyk asked the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6265 - 2005-03-31
on Kuchinskas’s breath. He also noticed Kuchinskas was stumbling quite a bit. Ratajczyk asked the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6265 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
On January 24, 2012, Harris filed a postconviction motion to modify his sentence.1 As noted, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90237 - 2014-09-15
On January 24, 2012, Harris filed a postconviction motion to modify his sentence.1 As noted, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90237 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Penny P. Skaife
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
State v. Penny P. Skaife
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 12-10 - Comments from Supreme Court Referee
to be quite reasonable, for the reasons given in the OLR’s supporting memorandum. Sincerely
/supreme/docs/1210commentsreferee.pdf - 2012-11-07
to be quite reasonable, for the reasons given in the OLR’s supporting memorandum. Sincerely
/supreme/docs/1210commentsreferee.pdf - 2012-11-07
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
for this appeal. We affirm the judgment and order. Pesek makes three claims in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9894 - 2005-03-31
for this appeal. We affirm the judgment and order. Pesek makes three claims in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
transcript for this appeal. We affirm the judgment and order. Pesek makes three claims in her complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9894 - 2017-09-19
transcript for this appeal. We affirm the judgment and order. Pesek makes three claims in her complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9894 - 2017-09-19