Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 63530 for records.
Search results 3451 - 3460 of 63530 for records.
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127874 - 2014-11-18
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127874 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187485 - 2017-09-21
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187485 - 2017-09-21
Darryl M. Bunker v. David H. Schwarz
not properly record the chain of custody, and did not honor his request for retesting. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6977 - 2005-03-31
not properly record the chain of custody, and did not honor his request for retesting. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6977 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth Garrigan
in prison. This appeal ensued. The record contains no sentence modification or reconsideration motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31
in prison. This appeal ensued. The record contains no sentence modification or reconsideration motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103043 - 2017-09-21
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103043 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100090 - 2013-07-30
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100090 - 2013-07-30
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141507 - 2015-05-06
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141507 - 2015-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we No. 2018AP2071-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259364 - 2020-05-05
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we No. 2018AP2071-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259364 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214494 - 2018-06-20
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214494 - 2018-06-20