Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34501 - 34510 of 58789 for do.
Search results 34501 - 34510 of 58789 for do.
[PDF]
State v. Aaron J. Lindh
until his reply brief. Ordinarily, we do not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2487 - 2017-09-19
until his reply brief. Ordinarily, we do not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2487 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167556 - 2017-09-21
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167556 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit, and we therefore do not address them further. Although not addressed in the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660291 - 2023-05-23
arguable merit, and we therefore do not address them further. Although not addressed in the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660291 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Clifton L. Watts
. In their reply brief, the appellants acknowledge this argument but do not rebut it. We see nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10487 - 2017-09-20
. In their reply brief, the appellants acknowledge this argument but do not rebut it. We see nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10487 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. D'Angelo
of sentences and entry of judgments of conviction. We do not review alleged errors that were invited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2317 - 2017-09-19
of sentences and entry of judgments of conviction. We do not review alleged errors that were invited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2317 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient here. We do not disagree with the general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06
conclude that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient here. We do not disagree with the general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06
State v. Jeffery R. Janda
hour, and told the trial court: “I was doing forty-two maybe, forty-three, you know, around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7637 - 2005-03-31
hour, and told the trial court: “I was doing forty-two maybe, forty-three, you know, around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7637 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
have been. Because of that, we do not view Raymond’s appeal as either meritless or in bad faith. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90023 - 2012-12-04
have been. Because of that, we do not view Raymond’s appeal as either meritless or in bad faith. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90023 - 2012-12-04
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or more consecutive days. McNeal was advised of his right to file a response and did not do so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
or more consecutive days. McNeal was advised of his right to file a response and did not do so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14