Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34511 - 34520 of 64765 for b's.
Search results 34511 - 34520 of 64765 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
a correctional institution.” Wis. Stat. § 302.1135(1)(b). At a hearing on the petition, the inmate has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105841 - 2013-12-18
a correctional institution.” Wis. Stat. § 302.1135(1)(b). At a hearing on the petition, the inmate has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105841 - 2013-12-18
State v. John Norman
), 943.20(1)(a) and (b) respectively.[1] Norman argues that the trial court erred by precluding him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4677 - 2005-03-31
), 943.20(1)(a) and (b) respectively.[1] Norman argues that the trial court erred by precluding him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4677 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] American Family confuses the fair market value of a business (i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52942 - 2010-08-02
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] American Family confuses the fair market value of a business (i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52942 - 2010-08-02
State v. William P. Haessly
not objectionable. B. Charging Delay. ¶14 Haessly next claims he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31
not objectionable. B. Charging Delay. ¶14 Haessly next claims he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31
Jacquie Hur v. Laverne Holler
, the court awarded the Hollers $16,146.87 in costs and attorney fees, pursuant to §§ 804.12(2)(b) and 804.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31
, the court awarded the Hollers $16,146.87 in costs and attorney fees, pursuant to §§ 804.12(2)(b) and 804.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald E. Powers
) and with a prohibited alcohol level (PAC), contrary to § 343.63(1)(a) and (b), STATS. He filed a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12706 - 2017-09-21
) and with a prohibited alcohol level (PAC), contrary to § 343.63(1)(a) and (b), STATS. He filed a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 46
)(b) (2021-22)1 on August 19, 2020. On August 27, Kornreich’s attorney, Phillip S. Georges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690818 - 2023-10-11
)(b) (2021-22)1 on August 19, 2020. On August 27, Kornreich’s attorney, Phillip S. Georges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690818 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
Richmond Ato Yarney v. State
, and will not be considered. B. Section 893.82, STATS., Notice of Claim Issues. The circuit court held that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12482 - 2017-09-21
, and will not be considered. B. Section 893.82, STATS., Notice of Claim Issues. The circuit court held that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12482 - 2017-09-21
Buffy B. Brown v. Michael J. Grosch
Buffy B. Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. Grosch and Erin M. Grosch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18030 - 2005-05-04
Buffy B. Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. Grosch and Erin M. Grosch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18030 - 2005-05-04
State v. George Reed
not warrant a new trial. B. Ineffective Assistance. Next, Reed claims he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
not warrant a new trial. B. Ineffective Assistance. Next, Reed claims he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31