Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34511 - 34520 of 82994 for simple case search.

State v. Felipe Ayala
never ruled on the issue of whether Ayala had made a prima facie case, we shift our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12018 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kris A. Westberg
(citations omitted).[2] Because the procedural history of this case and the evidentiary history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
cases that were handled together at a joint sentencing hearing, and an order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137157 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
or TPR cases. Instead, the court ordered Jasmine taken into temporary nonsecure physical custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34800 - 2008-12-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25

[PDF] NOTICE
or TPR cases. Instead, the court ordered Jasmine taken into temporary nonsecure physical custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John R. Martin
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11311 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John R. Martin
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to one of the cases in which he acted as appointed counsel were not supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347189 - 2021-03-23

Timothy M. Krause v. Donald Kaminski
The issue in this case is whether the trial court’s interpretation of § 10.80 ILHR was correct. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13798 - 2005-03-31