Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34521 - 34530 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 34521 - 34530 of 38489 for t's.
Scott Herek v. Police & Fire Commission Village of Menomonee Falls
of just cause. The court declined to disturb the Commission’s penalty, stating, “[T]he Commission acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14224 - 2005-03-31
of just cause. The court declined to disturb the Commission’s penalty, stating, “[T]he Commission acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14224 - 2005-03-31
Town of Delafield v. Eric Winkelman
preclusion controls it. See Michelle T. v. Crozier, 173 Wis. 2d 681, 687, 495 N.W.2d 327 (1993) (concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5143 - 2005-03-31
preclusion controls it. See Michelle T. v. Crozier, 173 Wis. 2d 681, 687, 495 N.W.2d 327 (1993) (concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court commented that “[i]t’s not clear” to what extent Leszynski was remorseful, it was basically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142910 - 2017-09-21
the court commented that “[i]t’s not clear” to what extent Leszynski was remorseful, it was basically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Scott Herek v. Police & Fire Commission Village of Menomonee Falls
cause. The court declined to disturb the Commission’s penalty, stating, “[T]he Commission acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14224 - 2014-09-15
cause. The court declined to disturb the Commission’s penalty, stating, “[T]he Commission acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Bryan R. Thompson v. Cheri Thompson
at the time of the motion, defined "gross income adjusted for child support" as including: [T]he business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7924 - 2017-09-19
at the time of the motion, defined "gross income adjusted for child support" as including: [T]he business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7924 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andrew James Garner
supports the denial of an evidentiary hearing. Its brief to this court maintains: [T]he state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
supports the denial of an evidentiary hearing. Its brief to this court maintains: [T]he state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Ethelyn I.C. v. Waukesha County
there that “[t]he legislature did not intend that a petitioner must be omnipresent; the petitioner need only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21
there that “[t]he legislature did not intend that a petitioner must be omnipresent; the petitioner need only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Justus C. Burgweger
were “a battery of tests [and] [t]he clues mean nothing if you don’t count them all.” Id. at 446
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14477 - 2017-09-21
were “a battery of tests [and] [t]he clues mean nothing if you don’t count them all.” Id. at 446
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sentence modification, the State actually argued that “[t]he value of [Schwartz’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791227 - 2024-04-23
motion for sentence modification, the State actually argued that “[t]he value of [Schwartz’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791227 - 2024-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To satisfy the prejudice prong, “[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713814 - 2023-10-17
of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To satisfy the prejudice prong, “[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713814 - 2023-10-17