Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34531 - 34540 of 59033 for do.
Search results 34531 - 34540 of 59033 for do.
COURT OF APPEALS
the court was attempting to express its compliance with its statutory obligation; we do not perceive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
the court was attempting to express its compliance with its statutory obligation; we do not perceive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
CA Blank Order
. It also considered several relevant secondary factors. In doing so, the court explained why Garcia’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124672 - 2014-10-21
. It also considered several relevant secondary factors. In doing so, the court explained why Garcia’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124672 - 2014-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Vance
-CR 95-2350-CR -3- We do not accept Vance's argument that the State must justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9577 - 2017-09-19
-CR 95-2350-CR -3- We do not accept Vance's argument that the State must justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9577 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
undeveloped arguments because to do so would require me to abandon my neutrality. See State v. Pettit, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245855 - 2019-08-29
undeveloped arguments because to do so would require me to abandon my neutrality. See State v. Pettit, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245855 - 2019-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion in modifying the placement schedule because it explained its reasons for doing so in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30513 - 2007-10-03
discretion in modifying the placement schedule because it explained its reasons for doing so in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30513 - 2007-10-03
Tony Walker v. Department of Corrections
. App. 1999). We thus grant the motion to strike the reply brief and do not consider Walker’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1999). We thus grant the motion to strike the reply brief and do not consider Walker’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrell L. Garner
, the trial court’s ruling on his objection was based on an error of fact. However, we do not review issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11385 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court’s ruling on his objection was based on an error of fact. However, we do not review issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11385 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
reviewed the extensive sentencing transcript, we do not agree. Although Hellman undoubtedly would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the extensive sentencing transcript, we do not agree. Although Hellman undoubtedly would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
Warren Slocum v. Sandra Hohman
for relief. The court’s oral rulings do not always include findings and conclusions on every aspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14644 - 2005-03-31
for relief. The court’s oral rulings do not always include findings and conclusions on every aspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in modifying the placement schedule because it explained its reasons for doing so in light of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30513 - 2014-09-15
in modifying the placement schedule because it explained its reasons for doing so in light of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30513 - 2014-09-15