Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34541 - 34550 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 34541 - 34550 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth J. Pounds
.” Id. It appears that the trial court computed the beginning of the five-year repeater period using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11066 - 2017-09-19
.” Id. It appears that the trial court computed the beginning of the five-year repeater period using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11066 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark J. Modory
. ANDERSON, P.J. Mark J. Modory appeals from an order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9438 - 2005-03-31
. ANDERSON, P.J. Mark J. Modory appeals from an order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
(1) does not apply post-trial.2 In the alternative, Sain argues that the circuit court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33003 - 2014-09-15
(1) does not apply post-trial.2 In the alternative, Sain argues that the circuit court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33003 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
J.P. Mach, Inc. v. Wayne Stewart
an order dismissing his complaint against Wayne Stewart. The issue is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8714 - 2017-09-19
an order dismissing his complaint against Wayne Stewart. The issue is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Modory
. ANDERSON, P.J. Mark J. Modory appeals from an order of the trial court where he was adjudicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
. ANDERSON, P.J. Mark J. Modory appeals from an order of the trial court where he was adjudicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Florence County v. Brad Richtig
), STATS. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred by failing to correctly apply the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13484 - 2017-09-21
), STATS. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred by failing to correctly apply the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William J. Cody, Jr. v. Mary L. Cody
that the property should be excluded, because after William, Sr. died, Mary gave it to Bryan.1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7843 - 2017-09-19
that the property should be excluded, because after William, Sr. died, Mary gave it to Bryan.1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7843 - 2017-09-19
John C. O'Neill v. Arthur N. Krattiger
between the Krattigers and the Brodbecks, but without the O’Neills’ approval, the trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15758 - 2005-03-31
between the Krattigers and the Brodbecks, but without the O’Neills’ approval, the trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John C. O'Neill v. Arthur N. Krattiger
and the Brodbecks, but without the O’Neills’ approval, the trial court ordered the restriction replaced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15758 - 2017-09-21
and the Brodbecks, but without the O’Neills’ approval, the trial court ordered the restriction replaced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15758 - 2017-09-21
Curt Wenzel v. Kristy Peters
against Kristy Peters and her insurer. The matter was tried to a jury. The trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31
against Kristy Peters and her insurer. The matter was tried to a jury. The trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4331 - 2005-03-31