Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34551 - 34560 of 83180 for case search.
Search results 34551 - 34560 of 83180 for case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2001
2001 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32 - 2007-02-12
2001 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32 - 2007-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
The terms of the plea agreement here were attached to the plea questionnaire which included the case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2011-07-25
The terms of the plea agreement here were attached to the plea questionnaire which included the case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2011-07-25
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2010-06-01
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045485 - 2025-12-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045485 - 2025-12-04
[PDF]
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
2003 WI App 247 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5688 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 247 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5688 - 2017-09-19
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
2003 WI App 247 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2541 02-2586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5708 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 247 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2541 02-2586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5708 - 2005-03-31
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
2003 WI App 247 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2541 02-2586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5688 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 247 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2541 02-2586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5688 - 2005-03-31
AKG Real Estate, LLC v. Patrick J. Kosterman
2006 WI 106 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP188 Complete Title: AKG
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25925 - 2006-07-13
2006 WI 106 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP188 Complete Title: AKG
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25925 - 2006-07-13