Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34551 - 34560 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Search results 34551 - 34560 of 58381 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim for plea withdrawal based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Nevertheless, having
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
to a claim for plea withdrawal based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Nevertheless, having
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
Robert J. Goldammer v. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc.
decide without deference to the trial court. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31
decide without deference to the trial court. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chase Conners
on evidence of drug possession seized from their residence. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2265 - 2017-09-19
on evidence of drug possession seized from their residence. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2265 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Gregory J. Sendelbach
in that there was no probable cause to believe that he had committed a crime. The trial court denied the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9306 - 2017-09-19
in that there was no probable cause to believe that he had committed a crime. The trial court denied the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9306 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert O. Schmidt
, trial counsel was ineffective for not seeking a limiting instruction, and postconviction and appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4135 - 2005-03-31
, trial counsel was ineffective for not seeking a limiting instruction, and postconviction and appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4135 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Popke in this case had presided over a civil trial filed by the victim’s family against Popke. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
Popke in this case had presided over a civil trial filed by the victim’s family against Popke. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
Judith L. Marshe v. Patrick B. Sheehan
Fourteenth Amendment right to privacy. We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the tape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11114 - 2005-03-31
Fourteenth Amendment right to privacy. We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the tape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
David G. Aul v. Charles L. Murray
to Kathryn Murray in a divorce action. We affirm the judgment and remand to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8833 - 2005-03-31
to Kathryn Murray in a divorce action. We affirm the judgment and remand to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8833 - 2005-03-31