Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34571 - 34580 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34571 - 34580 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Carolyn G.
exercised its discretion when it denied her motion seeking to vacate the default judgment entered when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5011 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion when it denied her motion seeking to vacate the default judgment entered when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5011 - 2005-03-31
Albert H. Beaver v. Norbert Mueller
in deciding [their] motion for disqualification of judge”; and (3) sanctioning the Beavers under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5030 - 2005-03-31
in deciding [their] motion for disqualification of judge”; and (3) sanctioning the Beavers under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5030 - 2005-03-31
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for habeas corpus relief. The issues are whether McCloud was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44849 - 2009-12-21
motion for habeas corpus relief. The issues are whether McCloud was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44849 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
the trial court. The trial court initially denied Maryland Casualty’s motion seeking summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14453 - 2017-09-21
the trial court. The trial court initially denied Maryland Casualty’s motion seeking summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14453 - 2017-09-21
State v. John W. Moore
conference and a January 27, 1998 motion hearing. Perhaps there were some portions of other hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
conference and a January 27, 1998 motion hearing. Perhaps there were some portions of other hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
children, and from an order denying her postdisposition motion. V.T. argues that she was provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095433 - 2026-03-23
children, and from an order denying her postdisposition motion. V.T. argues that she was provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095433 - 2026-03-23
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
heroin and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
heroin and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the video of the colposcope examination. The circuit court granted the motion and ordered Children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
of the video of the colposcope examination. The circuit court granted the motion and ordered Children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19