Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34571 - 34580 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34571 - 34580 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Albert H. Beaver v. Norbert Mueller
in deciding [their] motion for disqualification of judge”; and (3) sanctioning the Beavers under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5030 - 2005-03-31
in deciding [their] motion for disqualification of judge”; and (3) sanctioning the Beavers under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5030 - 2005-03-31
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for habeas corpus relief. The issues are whether McCloud was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44849 - 2009-12-21
motion for habeas corpus relief. The issues are whether McCloud was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44849 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
the trial court. The trial court initially denied Maryland Casualty’s motion seeking summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14453 - 2017-09-21
the trial court. The trial court initially denied Maryland Casualty’s motion seeking summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14453 - 2017-09-21
State v. John W. Moore
conference and a January 27, 1998 motion hearing. Perhaps there were some portions of other hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
conference and a January 27, 1998 motion hearing. Perhaps there were some portions of other hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
heroin and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
heroin and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4565 - 2017-09-19
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4565 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, denying his motion for sentence modification. Kyle asserts that he should have been tried in juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
, denying his motion for sentence modification. Kyle asserts that he should have been tried in juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b) (2017-18).1 Kingsley argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
)(b) (2017-18).1 Kingsley argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27