Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34581 - 34590 of 47541 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Pemborong Kitchen Set PVC Profesional Depok town square Depok.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was on extended supervision and, pursuant to an Act 79 search,2 recovered over $600 from his person and a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060000 - 2026-01-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance did not warrant an evidentiary hearing. Madison’s motions did not set forth how he would prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87609 - 2014-09-15

State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A new factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
review the interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2. and its application to a given set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27526 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
language is “strongly preferred,” a court’s failure to use the exact language set forth in § 971.08(1)(c
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122252 - 2014-09-17

[PDF] State v. Terrance Bernard Davis
. Champion, 2002 WI App 267, ¶4, 258 Wis. 2d 781, 654 N.W.2d 242. A “new factor” is a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7318 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Gelbert Martinez v. Jefferson Insurance
granting summary judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11382 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Laurie Ruth Rosin v. Lee Alan Scholtus
set forth in § 767.24(5), STATS. We therefore reverse the order entered without the participation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11588 - 2017-09-19

Michael Davis v. Gary McCaughtry
the duties set forth in § 302.04, Stats.,[3] and is responsible for the overall operation and administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13263 - 2005-03-31

Waukesha County v. Michael R. Johnson
, 610 N.W.2d 222. ¶7 The circuit court found that the four individuals “clearly set out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2624 - 2005-03-31