Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Derrick C. Evans
an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. The issues are: (1) whether Evans, as an overnight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. The issues are: (1) whether Evans, as an overnight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ronan T. Heaney
Heaney’s motion to suppress evidence obtained subsequent to a traffic stop. Heaney seeks relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6168 - 2005-03-31
Heaney’s motion to suppress evidence obtained subsequent to a traffic stop. Heaney seeks relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David M. Womble
, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Womble argues his conviction should be reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Womble argues his conviction should be reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his suppression motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31
contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his suppression motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31
[PDF]
Tina Harmon v. City of Milwaukee
court erred when it ruled on a motion after verdict that was filed in violation of the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13045 - 2017-09-21
court erred when it ruled on a motion after verdict that was filed in violation of the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13045 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances, we conclude that the investigatory stop was lawful. Reindl-Knaak’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
of the circumstances, we conclude that the investigatory stop was lawful. Reindl-Knaak’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
drug possession charges and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore argues he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38346 - 2014-09-15
drug possession charges and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore argues he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38346 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stanley F. Toczynski
by an unnamed informant." Defense counsel sought the informer's identity in a discovery motion unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9125 - 2017-09-19
by an unnamed informant." Defense counsel sought the informer's identity in a discovery motion unsupported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9125 - 2017-09-19
State v. David J. Brock
. § 961.41(3g)(e). Brock claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress based upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
. § 961.41(3g)(e). Brock claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress based upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31