Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 52608 for address.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 52608 for address.
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
this burden on one prong, we need not address the other prong. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
this burden on one prong, we need not address the other prong. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
pronouncement was granted. The no-merit report addresses the potential issues of whether Carr’s plea was freely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91221 - 2013-01-08
pronouncement was granted. The no-merit report addresses the potential issues of whether Carr’s plea was freely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91221 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the factors that they address in their briefs are relevant. Given our de novo standard of review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
of the factors that they address in their briefs are relevant. Given our de novo standard of review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
did not expressly address the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, his description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37599 - 2009-07-20
did not expressly address the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, his description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37599 - 2009-07-20
State v. Angelo T. Kaszuba
by trial counsel’s performance, we need not address whether such performance was deficient. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10006 - 2005-03-31
by trial counsel’s performance, we need not address whether such performance was deficient. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10006 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 20, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
not address its argument the court erred when it reformed the contract rather than granting foreclosure. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52361 - 2010-07-19
not address its argument the court erred when it reformed the contract rather than granting foreclosure. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52361 - 2010-07-19
Jeffrey Carey v. Michael C. Ablan
counterclaim. The Careys do not address his contention that this proceeding is the appropriate forum to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6691 - 2005-03-31
counterclaim. The Careys do not address his contention that this proceeding is the appropriate forum to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6691 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction and appellate proceedings. ¶9 Finally, we briefly address McAdoo’s claim that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35796 - 2009-03-09
postconviction and appellate proceedings. ¶9 Finally, we briefly address McAdoo’s claim that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35796 - 2009-03-09
State v. John R. Martin
. The no merit report addresses whether Martin's no contest pleas were knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
. The no merit report addresses whether Martin's no contest pleas were knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph E. Peat
the gross weight of the dump truck was unlawful. But we need not address this assertion. We have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13141 - 2005-03-31
the gross weight of the dump truck was unlawful. But we need not address this assertion. We have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13141 - 2005-03-31