Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acts, words and statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
acts, words and statements, if any, and from all the facts and circumstances in this case bearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or her statements. Id. The non-anonymous nature of the informant shows reliability to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
or her statements. Id. The non-anonymous nature of the informant shows reliability to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
statement by the court that was not made at the sentencing hearing: “I appreciate that the state takes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
statement by the court that was not made at the sentencing hearing: “I appreciate that the state takes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Joanne Sekula
. If a detention is illegal and violative of the Fourth Amendment, all statements given and items seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3712 - 2017-09-19
. If a detention is illegal and violative of the Fourth Amendment, all statements given and items seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3712 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not “mean to imply that the general categorization of statutory grounds … represent a definitive statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100241 - 2017-09-21
not “mean to imply that the general categorization of statutory grounds … represent a definitive statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by not addressing it in his statement of issues or his argument in his brief-in-chief. In June 2019, our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440107 - 2021-10-12
by not addressing it in his statement of issues or his argument in his brief-in-chief. In June 2019, our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440107 - 2021-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, although there was no time frame attached to that statement. ¶20 Additionally, the jury heard evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526399 - 2022-06-01
, although there was no time frame attached to that statement. ¶20 Additionally, the jury heard evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526399 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, gave statements that are “not consistent.” This claim too must fail. ¶14 The ALJ considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140081 - 2017-09-21
, gave statements that are “not consistent.” This claim too must fail. ¶14 The ALJ considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carolyn G.
than by default judgment. Although this court does not disagree with the general policy statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5012 - 2017-09-19
than by default judgment. Although this court does not disagree with the general policy statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5012 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carolyn G.
than by default judgment. Although this court does not disagree with the general policy statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19
than by default judgment. Although this court does not disagree with the general policy statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5013 - 2017-09-19