Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 64954 for or b.
Search results 34591 - 34600 of 64954 for or b.
[PDF]
Jacquie Hur v. LaVerne Holler
fees, pursuant to §§ 804.12(2)(b) and 804.12(4), STATS. Hur objects on appeal to $11,898.55
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9883 - 2017-09-19
fees, pursuant to §§ 804.12(2)(b) and 804.12(4), STATS. Hur objects on appeal to $11,898.55
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9883 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the pleader seeks.” WIS. STAT. § 802.02(1)(a)-(b). However, because allegations of fraud were made here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027338 - 2025-10-22
the pleader seeks.” WIS. STAT. § 802.02(1)(a)-(b). However, because allegations of fraud were made here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027338 - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
specified by statute. See WIS. No. 04-2795-FT 8 STAT. § 51.20(2)(b). The three-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
specified by statute. See WIS. No. 04-2795-FT 8 STAT. § 51.20(2)(b). The three-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299 (1990). b. Ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34510 - 2008-11-11
was prejudicial. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299 (1990). b. Ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34510 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was provided to this court as Exhibit B to appellate counsel’s affidavit in support of the supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742722 - 2023-12-19
was provided to this court as Exhibit B to appellate counsel’s affidavit in support of the supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742722 - 2023-12-19
Margaret Jane Kozlowicz v. Jeffrey David Schwartz
to the six month limitation under § 785.04(1)(b), Stats. He asks that both contempt orders be vacated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
to the six month limitation under § 785.04(1)(b), Stats. He asks that both contempt orders be vacated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kimberly D. Erkkila-Miller v. James E. Stoll, M.D.
or town, county and state of residence. (b) The name of the patient. (c) The name and address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13110 - 2017-09-21
or town, county and state of residence. (b) The name of the patient. (c) The name and address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13110 - 2017-09-21
Calvary Covenant Church v. Marie Nyquist
of the will as provided under sub. (1). (b) The testator’s implicit or explicit acknowledgement of the testator’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3911 - 2005-03-31
of the will as provided under sub. (1). (b) The testator’s implicit or explicit acknowledgement of the testator’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
,” § 77.21(3)(b). Each transfer here was accomplished by a separate deed, and whatever the motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19
,” § 77.21(3)(b). Each transfer here was accomplished by a separate deed, and whatever the motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sheila M.
. (b) In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5450 - 2005-03-31
. (b) In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5450 - 2005-03-31