Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 29996 for de.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 29996 for de.
2008 WI APP 139
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
Sally J. Schultz-Fuhrman v. James R. Fuhrman
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26285 - 2006-08-28
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26285 - 2006-08-28
State v. Garrett A.B.
that we resolve de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31
that we resolve de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31
Katherine H. Leete v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
contentions require that we construe Wis. Stat. § 895.52, a question of law we review de novo. We must give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16250 - 2005-03-31
contentions require that we construe Wis. Stat. § 895.52, a question of law we review de novo. We must give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16250 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl R. Kramer
). However, we review de novo whether the trial court applied the correct legal standard to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
). However, we review de novo whether the trial court applied the correct legal standard to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
County of Iowa v. Randy D. Skogen
. Whether those facts establish probable cause is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11262 - 2009-05-21
. Whether those facts establish probable cause is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11262 - 2009-05-21
State v. Thomas Z. P.
ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo dispositional hearing and placement determination based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4425 - 2005-03-31
ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo dispositional hearing and placement determination based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4425 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Troy Barner
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9104 - 2017-09-19
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9104 - 2017-09-19
State v. Derrick C. Evans
, J., concurring). Whether Evans has made such a showing is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2006-01-24
, J., concurring). Whether Evans has made such a showing is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29934 - 2014-09-15
¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29934 - 2014-09-15