Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 29740 for des.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Curran
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11045 - 2017-09-19
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11045 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Palisades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110135 - 2017-09-21
¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Palisades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110135 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to the trial court’s findings de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48261 - 2010-03-23
review the application of constitutional principles to the trial court’s findings de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48261 - 2010-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lamb v. Manning, 145 Wis. 2d 619, 628, 427 N.W.2d 437 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15
, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lamb v. Manning, 145 Wis. 2d 619, 628, 427 N.W.2d 437 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21324 - 2006-02-07
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21324 - 2006-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Shirlene Davis
that we resolve de novo. See State v. Eason, 2000 WI App 73 ¶ 3, 234 Wis. 2d 396, 398, 610 N.W.2d 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16037 - 2017-09-21
that we resolve de novo. See State v. Eason, 2000 WI App 73 ¶ 3, 234 Wis. 2d 396, 398, 610 N.W.2d 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16037 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 139
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Garrett A.B.
(16), STATS. Interpretation of statutes presents legal issues that we resolve de novo. Truttschel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
(16), STATS. Interpretation of statutes presents legal issues that we resolve de novo. Truttschel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 23
6 DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
6 DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10
[PDF]
WI APP 3
reviews de novo.” Wegner v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2007 WI App 18, ¶11, 298 Wis. 2d 420, 728 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo.” Wegner v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2007 WI App 18, ¶11, 298 Wis. 2d 420, 728 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74631 - 2014-09-15