Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 46936 for show's.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 46936 for show's.
[PDF]
State v. Leroy K. Kuhnke
assistance of counsel, Kuhnke must satisfy a two-pronged test. First, he must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12494 - 2017-09-21
assistance of counsel, Kuhnke must satisfy a two-pronged test. First, he must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12494 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm on the grounds that the State has not met its burden of showing by a preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778506 - 2024-03-21
. We affirm on the grounds that the State has not met its burden of showing by a preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778506 - 2024-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
further conclude that Edwards fails to show that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
further conclude that Edwards fails to show that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
State v. Dana Richardson
that the trial court erred by not permitting him to show that the felony charge on which he was to be tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7839 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by not permitting him to show that the felony charge on which he was to be tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7839 - 2017-09-19
State v. Maurice D. Harris
, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the performance prejudiced his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the performance prejudiced his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 350 (Ct. App. 1992). The burden is on Clark to show that he is not in contempt. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119978 - 2014-08-26
N.W.2d 350 (Ct. App. 1992). The burden is on Clark to show that he is not in contempt. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119978 - 2014-08-26
State v. Maurice D. Harris
, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the performance prejudiced his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2005-03-31
, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the performance prejudiced his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2005-03-31
Stratford Area Fire Department v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. App. 1989). That presumption may be rebutted by a “specific showing … made in an individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2475 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1989). That presumption may be rebutted by a “specific showing … made in an individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pastor Ramirez
, but the factual statements that follow that assertion show only the possibility that Ramirez was confused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26145 - 2017-09-21
, but the factual statements that follow that assertion show only the possibility that Ramirez was confused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to show that he is not in contempt. Id. ¶6 The only reason that Clark presented at the contempt hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119978 - 2014-09-15
to show that he is not in contempt. Id. ¶6 The only reason that Clark presented at the contempt hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119978 - 2014-09-15