Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 46790 for shows.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conviction “is barred from making a claim that could have been raised previously unless he shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197520 - 2017-10-10

[PDF] State v. Pastor Ramirez
, but the factual statements that follow that assertion show only the possibility that Ramirez was confused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26145 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dana Richardson
that the trial court erred by not permitting him to show that the felony charge on which he was to be tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7839 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dana Richardson
. Richardson argues that the trial court erred by not permitting him to show that the felony charge on which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7839 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Erickson v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
). A property owner is entitled to a variance only upon a showing of unnecessary hardship. Id. at 472, 247 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9182 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s evidence shows is that he asked the complainant to come “to” his vehicle, not “into” his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64889 - 2014-09-15

Stratford Area Fire Department v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. App. 1989). That presumption may be rebutted by a “specific showing … made in an individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2475 - 2005-03-31

John Erickson v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
upon a showing of unnecessary hardship. Id. at 472, 247 N.W.2d at 102. Unnecessary hardship exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9182 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 350 (Ct. App. 1992). The burden is on Clark to show that he is not in contempt. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119978 - 2014-08-26

State v. Maurice D. Harris
, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the performance prejudiced his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2011-12-05