Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 19287 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 3461 - 3470 of 19287 for transfer by affidavit.
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
. In the motion and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
. In the motion and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously permitted the County to file an affidavit with its reply brief in support of its summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04
erroneously permitted the County to file an affidavit with its reply brief in support of its summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Minko Lewis
for an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), to determine whether the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
for an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), to determine whether the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
be transferred to that “new entity” so as to result in a novation. See Brooks v. Hayes, 133 Wis. 2d 228, 244–245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21368 - 2006-03-22
be transferred to that “new entity” so as to result in a novation. See Brooks v. Hayes, 133 Wis. 2d 228, 244–245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21368 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
contract that Wispark’s obligations to Brew City under the contract could be transferred to that “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21368 - 2017-09-21
contract that Wispark’s obligations to Brew City under the contract could be transferred to that “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21368 - 2017-09-21
Amber L. English v. Virgil Woodworth
of fact. If they do, we then examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
of fact. If they do, we then examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavits, if any, at least 5 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-22
affidavits, if any, at least 5 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
Thomas R. Leske v. John A. Leske
the claim. We turn to the affidavits submitted in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7719 - 2017-09-19
the claim. We turn to the affidavits submitted in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Milwaukee County submitted supporting affidavits. Hills, Hills Legal Group, and Progressive moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197489 - 2017-10-04
and Milwaukee County submitted supporting affidavits. Hills, Hills Legal Group, and Progressive moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197489 - 2017-10-04
Thomas R. Leske v. John A. Leske
this states a claim for violation of § 134.90, Stats. The answer denies the claim. We turn to the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31
this states a claim for violation of § 134.90, Stats. The answer denies the claim. We turn to the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31