Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34601 - 34610 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34601 - 34610 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officer who stopped him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182789 - 2017-09-21
that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officer who stopped him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182789 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
granting Kristin J. Haanstad’s motion to dismiss two citations for Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18129 - 2017-09-21
granting Kristin J. Haanstad’s motion to dismiss two citations for Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order denying his postconviction motion.3 Rushing claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29243 - 2014-09-15
an order denying his postconviction motion.3 Rushing claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4565 - 2017-09-19
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Valgene E. Loertscher v. The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company
denying their summary judgment motion.1 Uniroyal argues that summary judgment was appropriate because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11761 - 2017-09-20
denying their summary judgment motion.1 Uniroyal argues that summary judgment was appropriate because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11761 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, denying his motion for sentence modification. Kyle asserts that he should have been tried in juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
, denying his motion for sentence modification. Kyle asserts that he should have been tried in juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine which sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4563 - 2005-03-31
Peter’s sole claim of error relates to the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine which sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction, contending that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21
of conviction, contending that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21