Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34621 - 34630 of 69439 for as he.
Search results 34621 - 34630 of 69439 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a second offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143249 - 2017-09-21
as a second offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143249 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961906 - 2025-05-28
to the no-merit report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961906 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, unpublished slip 3 Piefer argues that he should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174084 - 2017-09-21
, unpublished slip 3 Piefer argues that he should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174084 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the jury on all three citations. However, he is not appealing the speeding conviction and asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35000 - 2014-09-15
by the jury on all three citations. However, he is not appealing the speeding conviction and asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35000 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
where (1) the petitioner asserts a claim that he or she could have raised during a prior appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89598 - 2012-11-26
where (1) the petitioner asserts a claim that he or she could have raised during a prior appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89598 - 2012-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
in the same respects he challenges on appeal, and also for imposing a disparately harsh sentence as compared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
in the same respects he challenges on appeal, and also for imposing a disparately harsh sentence as compared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
Richard J. Nichols v. Patrick J. Conlin
conclude that Nichols was not entitled to a just cause hearing because: (1) he served at “the pleasure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9786 - 2005-03-31
conclude that Nichols was not entitled to a just cause hearing because: (1) he served at “the pleasure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rev. Thomas Ponchik v. John J. Eversman
court’s notice to appear at a scheduling conference. In essence, he claims trial court error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11553 - 2017-09-19
court’s notice to appear at a scheduling conference. In essence, he claims trial court error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11553 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State charged him with one count of burglary, and he entered a guilty plea. His plea bargain included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31176 - 2007-12-12
. The State charged him with one count of burglary, and he entered a guilty plea. His plea bargain included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31176 - 2007-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
here. See Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis. 2d 433, 443, 287 N.W.2d 140 (1980). ¶6 Grube also contends he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88872 - 2012-11-05
here. See Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis. 2d 433, 443, 287 N.W.2d 140 (1980). ¶6 Grube also contends he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88872 - 2012-11-05