Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34621 - 34630 of 39128 for c's.
Search results 34621 - 34630 of 39128 for c's.
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence, “a reasonable person c[ould] interpret these statements as the court’s reiteration of the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100617 - 2013-08-12
sentence, “a reasonable person c[ould] interpret these statements as the court’s reiteration of the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100617 - 2013-08-12
State v. Joseph L. Smet
in s. 961.01(4m), of a controlled substance described in par. (a). (c) Cocaine or any of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20191 - 2006-01-09
in s. 961.01(4m), of a controlled substance described in par. (a). (c) Cocaine or any of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20191 - 2006-01-09
Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
“improper consideration,” contrary to Wis. Admin. Code § UWS 3.08(1)(c)2. Again, the Panel retained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31
“improper consideration,” contrary to Wis. Admin. Code § UWS 3.08(1)(c)2. Again, the Panel retained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 150
with any Laws or Regulations.” Similarly, the “[c]ontractor shall be solely responsible for initiating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54983 - 2010-11-16
with any Laws or Regulations.” Similarly, the “[c]ontractor shall be solely responsible for initiating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54983 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel’s performance.[5] C. Destruction of Evidence ¶15 Truss also alleged that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89959 - 2012-12-03
trial counsel’s performance.[5] C. Destruction of Evidence ¶15 Truss also alleged that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89959 - 2012-12-03
2008 WI App 161
incident to arrest. See State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34381 - 2008-11-11
incident to arrest. See State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34381 - 2008-11-11
Frontsheet
of the roadway; or (c) When the right half of the roadway is closed to traffic while under construction or repair
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36600 - 2009-05-26
of the roadway; or (c) When the right half of the roadway is closed to traffic while under construction or repair
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36600 - 2009-05-26
David Barlow v. Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
of the circuit court for Dane County: JOHN C. ALBERT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20207 - 2005-11-09
of the circuit court for Dane County: JOHN C. ALBERT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20207 - 2005-11-09
2010 WI APP 29
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Washington County: David C. Resheske, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45999 - 2010-02-23
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Washington County: David C. Resheske, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45999 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
briefs do not conform to WIS. STAT. RULES 809.19(1)(a), (3)(a)2. and (6)(c)2. because they do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79706 - 2014-09-15
briefs do not conform to WIS. STAT. RULES 809.19(1)(a), (3)(a)2. and (6)(c)2. because they do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79706 - 2014-09-15