Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34621 - 34630 of 64732 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF]
, 799 N.W.2d 898 (when evidence in the record consists of disputed testimony and a video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776116 - 2024-03-14

State v. Daryl M. Knighten
on the record. See id. at 550, 527 N.W.2d at 329. Knighten does not dispute that the trial court was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
1 Although the judgment of conviction is not included in the appellate record, we assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18649 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Green County Department of Human Services v. David L.
of a circuit court are clearly erroneous if there is no support for them in the record, Nos. 01-0755-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3747 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] H. A. Friend & Company v. Professional Stationery, Inc.
. Furthermore, PSI admitted on the record that it “failed to turn over the money,” was “sorry that happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25421 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
decisions when the trial court applies the proper legal standard and relies on the facts in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31822 - 2008-02-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 First, we disagree with Kerner that the record indicates the circuit court actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91732 - 2014-09-15

Green County Department of Human Services v. David L.
court are clearly erroneous if there is no support for them in the record, Noll v. Dimiceli’s, Inc., 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3747 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gregory S. Remsza v. Acuity
on the issue. We can only assume that somewhere in the record the parties broadened their stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26071 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Marvin L. Hereford
holding an evidentiary hearing, because it concluded that the motion and the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13971 - 2014-09-15