Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144355 - 2015-07-14
motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144355 - 2015-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
granted his motion to dismiss because his Facebook comments were protected speech. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115994 - 2014-07-02
granted his motion to dismiss because his Facebook comments were protected speech. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115994 - 2014-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a concealed knife.3 ¶5 Mikeal filed a postconviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737688 - 2023-12-13
a concealed knife.3 ¶5 Mikeal filed a postconviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737688 - 2023-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of the temporary order. ¶3 Following a hearing on Anuradha’s motion, the court ruled that Carter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34126 - 2008-10-08
of the temporary order. ¶3 Following a hearing on Anuradha’s motion, the court ruled that Carter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34126 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
to Wis. Stat. § 346.73(2). The trial court granted the motion. The court, however, allowed the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80138 - 2012-03-28
to Wis. Stat. § 346.73(2). The trial court granted the motion. The court, however, allowed the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80138 - 2012-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
and in violation of the temporary order. ¶3 Following a hearing on Anuradha’s motion, the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15
and in violation of the temporary order. ¶3 Following a hearing on Anuradha’s motion, the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presided over the post-dispositional motion hearing. No. 2014AP1714 2 ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134598 - 2017-09-21
presided over the post-dispositional motion hearing. No. 2014AP1714 2 ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134598 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Fargo’s summary judgment motion and dismissed the Hornbys’ counterclaims. No genuine issue of material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30
Fargo’s summary judgment motion and dismissed the Hornbys’ counterclaims. No genuine issue of material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Cleophus Amerson
of counsel. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9791 - 2017-09-19
of counsel. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9791 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Anthony L. Alsum v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s (DOT) motion to dismiss and motion to exclude the appraisal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6915 - 2017-09-20
the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s (DOT) motion to dismiss and motion to exclude the appraisal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6915 - 2017-09-20