Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 69534 for as he.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 69534 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and bloodshot; he admitted to having consumed one alcoholic beverage; and he was uncooperative. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
and bloodshot; he admitted to having consumed one alcoholic beverage; and he was uncooperative. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
it. ¶5 Keuken was convicted by the jury on all three citations. However, he is not appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22
it. ¶5 Keuken was convicted by the jury on all three citations. However, he is not appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he likely was the father, as well as the accuracy of an attached DNA test. Grube does not reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15
that he likely was the father, as well as the accuracy of an attached DNA test. Grube does not reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andrew M. Hansen
to meet its burden of proof. He further contends that the State failed to show that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7348 - 2017-09-20
to meet its burden of proof. He further contends that the State failed to show that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7348 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Mark David Hayter
CURIAM. Mark Hayter appeals a judgment convicting him of manufacturing THC. He also appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19
CURIAM. Mark Hayter appeals a judgment convicting him of manufacturing THC. He also appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of three drug offenses.[1] He argues the affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
a judgment convicting him of three drug offenses.[1] He argues the affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
[PDF]
Rev. Thomas Ponchik v. John J. Eversman
court’s notice to appear at a scheduling conference. In essence, he claims trial court error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11553 - 2017-09-19
court’s notice to appear at a scheduling conference. In essence, he claims trial court error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11553 - 2017-09-19
City of New Berlin v. Thomas W. Koeppen
Koeppen from prior contacts. He asked Koeppen to produce a driver's license and, after fumbling through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8398 - 2005-03-31
Koeppen from prior contacts. He asked Koeppen to produce a driver's license and, after fumbling through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following a traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143249 - 2015-06-17
offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following a traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143249 - 2015-06-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered against him. Mendoza-Medina argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he was prevented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35378 - 2014-09-15
entered against him. Mendoza-Medina argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he was prevented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35378 - 2014-09-15