Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 62450 for child support.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standing principles addressing the duty to disclose.” In support of this argument, Stamper cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79822 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
included offense of reckless homicide. Lopez does not cite any law in support of this argument, but merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26

CA Blank Order
, counsel’s misjudging the likely sentence would not support an arguably meritorious claim of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107219 - 2014-01-21

Tina Harmon v. City of Milwaukee
it ordered a new trial for comparative negligence. Because there was credible evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13045 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was shooting a gun when he was shot—evidence that the Averys believe would be exculpatory or support a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07

[PDF] State v. Brandon J. Green
contends that a warrant was not supported by probable cause, our focus is not on the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
if it applies the wrong legal standard or the facts of record fail to support the court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87369 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of postconviction counsel can be based upon ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the record supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The State contends that the search warrant was supported by probable cause. For the reasons set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242109 - 2019-06-13

COURT OF APPEALS
). Friedman argues that the evidence does not support his conviction.[3] The State responds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57954 - 2010-12-20