Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 65928 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 34631 - 34640 of 65928 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194558 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194558 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33016 - 2008-06-16
will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33016 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254222 - 2020-02-19
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254222 - 2020-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
CA Blank Order
for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96079 - 2013-04-30
for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96079 - 2013-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, Visgar withdrew his speedy trial demand before he entered his plea. Additionally, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34117 - 2008-09-24
, Visgar withdrew his speedy trial demand before he entered his plea. Additionally, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34117 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
he entered his plea. Additionally, the record does not contain a speedy trial demand. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34117 - 2014-09-15
he entered his plea. Additionally, the record does not contain a speedy trial demand. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William W. Bair
not apparent on the limited appellate record, the misdemeanor retail theft count was dismissed, the felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2833 - 2017-09-19
not apparent on the limited appellate record, the misdemeanor retail theft count was dismissed, the felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2833 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Barba filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93985 - 2013-03-12
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Barba filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93985 - 2013-03-12