Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34641 - 34650 of 83494 for case codes/1000.

2010 WI APP 57
2010 WI App 57 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP817-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS
of a Becker’s hearing … to allow Walter E. Kyle to present his case before a Juvenile Court”; this case should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865741 - 2024-10-23

[PDF] Remarks of Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler
a community with common interests. Even though you may be adversaries in a case, you are sisters
/news/docs/statebarremarks.pdf - 2022-06-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Motion/Brief in Support of Amicus Matthew Petering, Ph.D. to Proposed Legislative Map 173#008
-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Motion/Brief in Support of Amicus Matthew
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224motionbriefreportpetering.pdf - 2024-01-12

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - 01-12-24 Court Order re filing and service of proposed maps and related documents
is extended until Tuesday, January 16, 2024, at 12:00 p.m.; and Case 2023AP001399 01-12-24 Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224courtorder.pdf - 2024-01-12

Edwin C. West v. Byran Bartow
2002 WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0962 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3821 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roger A. Urbick
suspicion if a “reasonable inference of unlawful conduct can be objectively discerned.” In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jason R. Dodd
that Dubose should apply to his case, despite the fact that it was decided after he was sentenced, because new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24678 - 2006-04-03