Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34651 - 34660 of 83221 for case code.

COURT OF APPEALS
an incorrect legal standard. Id. The interpretation and application of statutes and case law to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20

State v. Perk E. Thomas
, given the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct. See id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14969 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 1522 on the Lake v. Nella Groysman
was not recorded and only the case file notes are provided. These indicate that judgment of $415 was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26130 - 2017-09-21

State v. William D. Taylor
not explicitly specify that a hearing was required in every case, we construe it to mean just that. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Aurelio Magdariaga
be removed from his case. On the October 11, 1995 trial date, the assistant district attorney informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10991 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is straightforward. Auto-Owners agreed to pay “compensatory damages any person is legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85905 - 2014-09-15

2010 WI APP 8
2010 WI App 8 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1985 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44903 - 2010-01-26

State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
must judge the reasonableness of counsel's challenged conduct on the facts of the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9812 - 2005-03-31

Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8451 - 2005-03-31

Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8449 - 2005-03-31