Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34651 - 34660 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 34651 - 34660 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be followed to the letter’”) (citation omitted). In this case, the trial court paraphrased this statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140095 - 2017-09-21
be followed to the letter’”) (citation omitted). In this case, the trial court paraphrased this statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140095 - 2017-09-21
WI App 138 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP225-CR Complete Tit...
“probation” and “prohibited” do not appear in this statute, an ordinary reading of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2012-12-18
“probation” and “prohibited” do not appear in this statute, an ordinary reading of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2012-12-18
State v. Charles E. Melton
on the information presented to it. That information included the prosecutor’s statements to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
on the information presented to it. That information included the prosecutor’s statements to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inculpatory statements to police. In them, he admitted that (1) he likes to videotape people while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111001 - 2017-09-21
inculpatory statements to police. In them, he admitted that (1) he likes to videotape people while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111001 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to alleged testimony or statements by the director of the City’s building inspection division and to other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101631 - 2013-09-04
to alleged testimony or statements by the director of the City’s building inspection division and to other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101631 - 2013-09-04
[PDF]
WI APP 35
objected to the court’s statement of fact nor argued to the contrary either before or after the comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15
objected to the court’s statement of fact nor argued to the contrary either before or after the comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William R. Junnor
, that there was a pat-down, the pipe was found, following after that the statement that it was a crack pipe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
, that there was a pat-down, the pipe was found, following after that the statement that it was a crack pipe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to suppress the results of field sobriety tests, his statements to the officer at the accident scene
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342956 - 2021-03-09
to suppress the results of field sobriety tests, his statements to the officer at the accident scene
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342956 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Guy N. Giese
was inconsistent. Inconsistencies and contradictions in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
was inconsistent. Inconsistencies and contradictions in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
State v. James R. Coleman
on the prejudice issue. He claims that the court only issued a “blanket statement” that the prejudice resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10258 - 2005-03-31
on the prejudice issue. He claims that the court only issued a “blanket statement” that the prejudice resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10258 - 2005-03-31