Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34661 - 34670 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 34661 - 34670 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
$91,000 payment. The Harrs counter-claimed for specific NO. 96-2200 3 performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11195 - 2017-09-19
$91,000 payment. The Harrs counter-claimed for specific NO. 96-2200 3 performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11195 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Prosser v. Richard A. Leuck
the insurance company open to a possible bad faith claim. See Cue v. Carthage College, 179 Wis.2d 175, 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12181 - 2017-09-21
the insurance company open to a possible bad faith claim. See Cue v. Carthage College, 179 Wis.2d 175, 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12181 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara Kloostra v. Travelers Insurance Company
of the safe-place statute and common law negligence arising from a slip and fall accident. Kloostra claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8801 - 2017-09-19
of the safe-place statute and common law negligence arising from a slip and fall accident. Kloostra claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8801 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (to bring a claim No. 2007AP1465 2 of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34157 - 2014-09-15
) (to bring a claim No. 2007AP1465 2 of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34157 - 2014-09-15
State v. James E. Lipscomb
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lipscomb claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18837 - 2005-07-05
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lipscomb claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18837 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” We construe this as a claim that Ojeda was not fully aware of the constitutional rights she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25
.” We construe this as a claim that Ojeda was not fully aware of the constitutional rights she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
.” He further claimed that his “pleas in these cases [sic] were deficient” because: the court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
to this court whether a claim for additional sentence credit would lack arguable merit. We therefore ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592966 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on a claim that Wallace’s pleas were anything other than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502390 - 2022-04-05
on a claim that Wallace’s pleas were anything other than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502390 - 2022-04-05