Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34661 - 34670 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the reduced acreage of the field. Kilmer then sued for specific performance. ¶4 Following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235460 - 2019-02-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was informed of the arousal or gratification element by his attorney. Parr’s trial attorney testified: “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109979 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
against his co-defendants. The trial court sentenced him to a total of thirty-five years’ initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92652 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Judith L. Marshe v. Patrick B. Sheehan
that the trial court properly admitted the tape into evidence and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND In 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11114 - 2017-09-19

State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. Before trial, Groesbeck filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4700 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to trial, Martinez moved to suppress evidence on the basis that photo arrays used had been unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2008-12-29

COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, § 346.63(1)(b). ¶5 At trial, the arresting officer testified about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91641 - 2013-01-15

Belmar Apartments v. Darryl Powell
for insufficiency of service. The trial court denied Powell’s motion and issued a writ of restitution. Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6941 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Deanna Graetz v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
in the manner in which Wal-Mart “designed, constructed, stocked and maintained the premises.”1 Pre-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3229 - 2017-09-19

State v. Thomas W. Reimann
by the trial court. In December 1994, Reimann brought a pro se motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31