Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34661 - 34670 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 34661 - 34670 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Mark Thomas Erickson
a judgment convicting him of sexual exploitation of a child. He argues that the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12821 - 2005-03-31
a judgment convicting him of sexual exploitation of a child. He argues that the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William Shew v. Bruce Roberts
the trial court's holding that the Shews' action was timely filed as a matter of law. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8067 - 2017-09-19
the trial court's holding that the Shews' action was timely filed as a matter of law. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8067 - 2017-09-19
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
to trial. Regardless of what information was given to Tiggs, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24816 - 2006-04-12
to trial. Regardless of what information was given to Tiggs, there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24816 - 2006-04-12
Judith L. Marshe v. Patrick B. Sheehan
Fourteenth Amendment right to privacy. We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the tape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11114 - 2005-03-31
Fourteenth Amendment right to privacy. We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the tape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11114 - 2005-03-31
Thomas J. Enders v. Northwoods Inn
argues that the trial court erroneously concluded that the Inn had no duty under the safe place statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6411 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erroneously concluded that the Inn had no duty under the safe place statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
of an intoxicant. Before trial, Groesbeck filed a motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
of an intoxicant. Before trial, Groesbeck filed a motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
01-14A Amendment of SCR 70.245, 71.01, 71.04 regarding court reporters (unpublished version, with comments)
It is customary that a transcript accompanies a video description when it is presented to the trial court
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958 - 2017-09-20
It is customary that a transcript accompanies a video description when it is presented to the trial court
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
resentencing, arguing the State’s sentencing remarks breached the plea agreement and Hawkins’ trial attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166055 - 2017-09-21
resentencing, arguing the State’s sentencing remarks breached the plea agreement and Hawkins’ trial attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166055 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
and seeking sentence modification. The trial court denied the motions without a hearing because Tahiri had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11704 - 2017-09-20
and seeking sentence modification. The trial court denied the motions without a hearing because Tahiri had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11704 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing. Fisher claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in several respects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92611 - 2013-02-06
for resentencing. Fisher claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in several respects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92611 - 2013-02-06