Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34671 - 34680 of 51600 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

John P. Gasienica v. Neil Richman
this case by granting Richman’s motion to dismiss based on the preclusive effect of the prior lawsuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4209 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth J. Mathers
; and the rights of the public. Id. at 623-24. In addition, the trial court may consider the deterrent effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19321 - 2005-08-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The Dorans commenced their adverse possession lawsuit on October 13, 1994, after the effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213609 - 2018-05-30

[PDF] State v. Carlton B. Campbell
at the time of his plea at arraignment.7 We do not decide whether Campbell's assumption about the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9503 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this was a secret.” The court credited her testimony to the effect that Willick asked her on the morning of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367376 - 2021-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to impeach both of the accomplice witnesses’ testimony more effectively. He acknowledges that the deal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15

State v. George Reed
Reed’s motion for a new trial, because Reed received effective assistance of counsel, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
this claim on appeal. ¶24 Spiller may not raise a challenge to the effectiveness of his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31119 - 2007-12-10

[PDF] State v. Kenneth J. Mathers
623-24. In addition, the trial court may consider the deterrent effect of the sentence. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19321 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Alternatively, he claims that a new trial is warranted based on the combined prejudicial effect of several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68840 - 2011-08-02