Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34671 - 34680 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Search results 34671 - 34680 of 58479 for speedy trial.
James Lohmiller v. This Week Publications
. On appeal, we apply the same methodology used by the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10036 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, we apply the same methodology used by the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97998 - 2014-09-15
and the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97998 - 2014-09-15
Robert J. Goldammer v. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc.
decide without deference to the trial court. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31
decide without deference to the trial court. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
grounds for a default judgment. After a trial to the court, the court entered a judgment dismissing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122272 - 2014-09-19
grounds for a default judgment. After a trial to the court, the court entered a judgment dismissing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122272 - 2014-09-19
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
into the stipulation. The trial court rejected Ardell’s motion as untimely. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20533 - 2005-12-06
into the stipulation. The trial court rejected Ardell’s motion as untimely. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20533 - 2005-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Suchla
right to an alternate test. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in not suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9945 - 2017-09-19
right to an alternate test. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in not suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9945 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Cole
. After a hearing on Cole’s request, the trial court issued an order denying his motion. Cole reasserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14805 - 2005-03-31
. After a hearing on Cole’s request, the trial court issued an order denying his motion. Cole reasserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14805 - 2005-03-31
Deanna Graetz v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
in the manner in which Wal-Mart “designed, constructed, stocked and maintained the premises.”[1] Pre-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3229 - 2005-03-31
in the manner in which Wal-Mart “designed, constructed, stocked and maintained the premises.”[1] Pre-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Popke in this case had presided over a civil trial filed by the victim’s family against Popke. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
Popke in this case had presided over a civil trial filed by the victim’s family against Popke. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29
counsel filed a motion seeking a new trial, arguing that Kupsky’s trial counsel provided him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29