Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34671 - 34680 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 34671 - 34680 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Douglas J. Miller
claimed that a search warrant was required to allow the State to analyze the blood sample. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
claimed that a search warrant was required to allow the State to analyze the blood sample. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne O. Jackson
be used until the appeal for that conviction is complete. The trial court rejected the theory and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3333 - 2017-09-19
be used until the appeal for that conviction is complete. The trial court rejected the theory and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Claudia Differt v. Voss-Jorgensen-Schueler Co., Inc.
that the trial court misinterpreted the law in granting summary judgment. We affirm. The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10166 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court misinterpreted the law in granting summary judgment. We affirm. The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10166 - 2017-09-19
09AP743 State v. Geraldine Booker.doc
constitutional right to counsel is a question of constitutional fact that we review independently of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40440 - 2009-09-08
constitutional right to counsel is a question of constitutional fact that we review independently of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40440 - 2009-09-08
Susan R. Schlough v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company
on the sidewalk adjacent to her residence. The Schloughs also allege that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31
on the sidewalk adjacent to her residence. The Schloughs also allege that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of reasons, the most prominent of which were that: (1) his trial transcripts were both incomplete (missing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102288 - 2013-09-22
of reasons, the most prominent of which were that: (1) his trial transcripts were both incomplete (missing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102288 - 2013-09-22
Robert J. Goldammer v. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc.
decide without deference to the trial court. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31
decide without deference to the trial court. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the arousal or gratification element by his attorney. Parr’s trial attorney testified: “I have no doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109979 - 2014-04-07
of the arousal or gratification element by his attorney. Parr’s trial attorney testified: “I have no doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109979 - 2014-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
of an intoxicant. Before trial, Groesbeck filed a motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
of an intoxicant. Before trial, Groesbeck filed a motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven Wadzinski v. Roger Daleidan
, allegedly for the same damage. The trial court dismissed the Wadzinskis-Daleidan lawsuit on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13620 - 2017-09-21
, allegedly for the same damage. The trial court dismissed the Wadzinskis-Daleidan lawsuit on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13620 - 2017-09-21