Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34691 - 34700 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 34691 - 34700 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Jennifer L. Weston v. Matthew J. B.
of the department’s case because there is evidence that supports the allegations in the petition. The guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18
of the department’s case because there is evidence that supports the allegations in the petition. The guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the case, we directed counsel to file a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161511 - 2017-09-21
review of the case, we directed counsel to file a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161511 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
? A. In this case. Q. So once he’s placed … in an out-of-home placement that may become a permanent placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58090 - 2010-12-20
? A. In this case. Q. So once he’s placed … in an out-of-home placement that may become a permanent placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58090 - 2010-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
assault case wanted to be excused early on the first day of the first trial date. Cardoza objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
assault case wanted to be excused early on the first day of the first trial date. Cardoza objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
[PDF]
Grant County Department of Social Services v. Unified Board of Grant and Iowa Counties
2004 WI App 153 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6245 - 2017-09-19
2004 WI App 153 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6245 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michele M. Rathke
. This case is about destruction [sic] the officer. It’s not a civil suit against the police force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4284 - 2005-03-31
. This case is about destruction [sic] the officer. It’s not a civil suit against the police force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case worker 1 This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81780 - 2014-09-15
case worker 1 This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81780 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The following facts are undisputed for purposes of this appeal. At all times relevant to this case, Reagor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219281 - 2018-09-18
The following facts are undisputed for purposes of this appeal. At all times relevant to this case, Reagor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219281 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
2 ANDERSON, J. In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs, Albert and Patricia Carini
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21
2 ANDERSON, J. In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs, Albert and Patricia Carini
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 The read-in offenses also encompassed the charge in another case and a recent uncharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219750 - 2018-09-25
1 The read-in offenses also encompassed the charge in another case and a recent uncharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219750 - 2018-09-25