Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34691 - 34700 of 66410 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 34691 - 34700 of 66410 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of imprisonment for the attempted homicide. ¶8 In June of 1996, Wilson filed a postconviction motion seeking
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141628 - 2017-09-21
of imprisonment for the attempted homicide. ¶8 In June of 1996, Wilson filed a postconviction motion seeking
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141628 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
a postconviction motion seeking a new trial based on the court's decision to exclude Wilson's proffered testimony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141628 - 2015-05-17
a postconviction motion seeking a new trial based on the court's decision to exclude Wilson's proffered testimony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141628 - 2015-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime. On appeal, Townsend argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747913 - 2024-01-09
to a crime. On appeal, Townsend argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747913 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his motion for postconviction discovery and DNA testing, and an order that denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218469 - 2018-08-29
his motion for postconviction discovery and DNA testing, and an order that denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218469 - 2018-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Brown argues that his attorney was ineffective for failing to file a motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34158 - 2008-09-29
motion. Brown argues that his attorney was ineffective for failing to file a motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34158 - 2008-09-29
State v. Mark D. Pett
motion required the suppression of certain evidence the State wanted to introduce. See Whitty v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
motion required the suppression of certain evidence the State wanted to introduce. See Whitty v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) motion seeking a new trial. 1 Boyd argues that he should be retried based on newly discovered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191662 - 2017-09-21
) motion seeking a new trial. 1 Boyd argues that he should be retried based on newly discovered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
the judgment of conviction. The Hon. Victor Manian presided over and denied Inman's subsequent motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10404 - 2017-09-20
the judgment of conviction. The Hon. Victor Manian presided over and denied Inman's subsequent motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10404 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals an order that denied his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
, appeals an order that denied his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sherwood L. Hard appeals from two postconviction orders denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39274 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sherwood L. Hard appeals from two postconviction orders denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39274 - 2014-09-15