Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34691 - 34700 of 38213 for ph d.
Search results 34691 - 34700 of 38213 for ph d.
[PDF]
Scott Herek v. Police & Fire Commission Village of Menomonee Falls
determining that “the good of the service require[d] removal in this instance,” the Commission considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14224 - 2014-09-15
determining that “the good of the service require[d] removal in this instance,” the Commission considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Pha Vue
and until the subject actually submits to the officer's authority. California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3491 - 2017-09-20
and until the subject actually submits to the officer's authority. California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3491 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, is twofold. First, “‘a verdict cannot stand when the jury ha[d] been subjected to any statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28476 - 2007-04-23
, is twofold. First, “‘a verdict cannot stand when the jury ha[d] been subjected to any statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28476 - 2007-04-23
State v. Jamerrel Everett
to do an act in the future is admissible to prove that the declarant acted in conformity.” 7 Daniel D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14846 - 2014-10-23
to do an act in the future is admissible to prove that the declarant acted in conformity.” 7 Daniel D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14846 - 2014-10-23
John Zinter, Jr. v. Darlene Oswskey
. § 895.52(6)(d), the social guest exception to the recreational immunity statute, would nullify the Oswskeys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3090 - 2005-03-31
. § 895.52(6)(d), the social guest exception to the recreational immunity statute, would nullify the Oswskeys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3090 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as a witness. (d) Attendance at an educational institution. (e) Medical treatment. (f) Obtaining counseling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
as a witness. (d) Attendance at an educational institution. (e) Medical treatment. (f) Obtaining counseling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
[PDF]
.
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088828 - 2026-03-11
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088828 - 2026-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Eugene D. Harrington Circuit Court Judge P.O. Box 339 Shell Lake, WI 54871 Claudia R. Burgan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21
. Eugene D. Harrington Circuit Court Judge P.O. Box 339 Shell Lake, WI 54871 Claudia R. Burgan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tamar T. Brown
. See State v. Petrovic, 224 Wis. 2d 477, 494-95, 592 N.W.2d 238 (Ct. App. 1999). D. Amending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12
. See State v. Petrovic, 224 Wis. 2d 477, 494-95, 592 N.W.2d 238 (Ct. App. 1999). D. Amending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The Miskos filed their petition under WIS. STAT. § 117.12, which provides for the “[d]etachment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683505 - 2023-07-27
The Miskos filed their petition under WIS. STAT. § 117.12, which provides for the “[d]etachment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683505 - 2023-07-27