Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 50863 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.

[PDF] Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
, disobeying an order, disrespect to an officer, and disruptive conduct. All resulted from an incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6890 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Robin Jean Sanders
proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. BACKGROUND. ΒΆ2 On March 18, 2003, police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7480 - 2017-09-20

State v. Gregory A. Miller
reckless injury and resisting an officer.[1] Miller argues that: (1) the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11991 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Marvin E. Miller
convicting him as a party to the crime of burglary. The issue is whether police officers unlawfully seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7831 - 2017-09-19

State v. Marvin L. Anderson
a Milwaukee police officer had sufficient reason to stop Anderson on the street and pat him down.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10560 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
have been suppressed because the police officers did not have probable cause to search the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202754 - 2017-11-21

[PDF] Larry J. Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
major offenses, whether the reporting officer was impartial, and whether there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12638 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Karl Julius James v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. No. 97-2199 3 bunk, a hearing officer, in an oral decision, found James guilty of disobeying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21

Karl Julius James v. Gary R. McCaughtry
detailing the verbal order to double bunk, a hearing officer, in an oral decision, found James guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12811 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 147
asserts that the officers did not possess a reasonable basis for concluding that entry was necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28847 - 2014-09-15