Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the parties free to argue as to the duration and terms of Grissett’s extended supervision. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968144 - 2025-06-10
the parties free to argue as to the duration and terms of Grissett’s extended supervision. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968144 - 2025-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, he was sentenced to two years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision on each count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
, he was sentenced to two years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision on each count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years of extended supervision on the strangulation and suffocation, (2) nine months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
confinement and three years of extended supervision on the strangulation and suffocation, (2) nine months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision for the child enticement count, and fifteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778966 - 2024-03-26
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision for the child enticement count, and fifteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778966 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
Kerry J. Kowal v. Gregory W. Kowal
February 1998, for unrelated reasons. In December 1998, Gregory moved to extend the discovery deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14436 - 2017-09-21
February 1998, for unrelated reasons. In December 1998, Gregory moved to extend the discovery deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14436 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and two years’ extended supervision.3 This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
confinement and two years’ extended supervision.3 This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed to recommend a sentence of no more than fifteen years’ initial confinement, leaving the extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101680 - 2013-09-09
agreed to recommend a sentence of no more than fifteen years’ initial confinement, leaving the extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101680 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision in connection with an armed robbery conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304209 - 2020-11-18
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision in connection with an armed robbery conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304209 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision for the child enticement count, and fifteen years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778966 - 2024-03-26
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision for the child enticement count, and fifteen years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778966 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP2732 3 years, consisting of twenty years’ initial confinement and forty-six years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138441 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP2732 3 years, consisting of twenty years’ initial confinement and forty-six years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138441 - 2017-09-21