Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 4880 for litem.

COURT OF APPEALS
, the individual sought to be protected, the individual’s guardian ad litem, or the county department. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS
of the guardian ad litem’s (GAL) fee as a sanction for overtrial. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145111 - 2015-07-27

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
that based on the recommendations of the guardian ad litem, the Department and the entire proceedings to date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“own personal decision.” ¶6 After questions from the guardian ad litem (GAL), Jay appeared less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859707 - 2024-10-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statute to § 767.471 “is entitled to recover the guardian ad litem fees attributable to him or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636598 - 2023-03-23

[PDF]
at the jury trial; (3) the guardian ad litem (GAL)2 referred to facts not in evidence in her closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05

[PDF] Mackenzie Fandrey v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
: Mackenzie Fandrey, a minor, by James B. Connell, her Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiff-Appellant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16675 - 2017-09-21

Mackenzie Fandrey v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
: Mackenzie Fandrey, a minor, by James B. Connell, her Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiff-Appellant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16675 - 2005-03-31

Tracie M. v. Andrew J.W.
parental responsibility." Alexis's guardian ad litem responded to the argument as follows: He could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11823 - 2005-03-31

Barbara M.Z. v. David P.C.
. In addition, the court considered the guardian ad litem’s recommendation that the children remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4670 - 2005-03-31