Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 6143 for sheriff.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 6143 for sheriff.
State v. David J. Fury
affirm. FACTS On the evening of March 10, 1995, Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9959 - 2005-03-31
affirm. FACTS On the evening of March 10, 1995, Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Disposition table for January & February 2011
/2011 2009AP3095-CR State v. Sheriff 02/07/2011 2009AP3122 Bonstores Realty Two, LLC v. City
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60945 - 2014-09-15
/2011 2009AP3095-CR State v. Sheriff 02/07/2011 2009AP3122 Bonstores Realty Two, LLC v. City
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60945 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Disposition table for July & August, 2004
. Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Dep’t 08/02/04 03-3133-CRNM State v. Olm 08/02/04 03-3146-CR State v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865 - 2017-09-20
. Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Dep’t 08/02/04 03-3133-CRNM State v. Olm 08/02/04 03-3146-CR State v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865 - 2017-09-20
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
and affirm the judgment. The facts are undisputed. Waukesha County Deputy Sheriffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the judgment. The facts are undisputed. Waukesha County Deputy Sheriffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
. Two police officers testified at the suppression hearing. The first, Marquette County Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
. Two police officers testified at the suppression hearing. The first, Marquette County Deputy Sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was the one conducting the transactions, sheriff deputies testified that they heard the sales take place over
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107905 - 2014-02-11
was the one conducting the transactions, sheriff deputies testified that they heard the sales take place over
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107905 - 2014-02-11
State v. David W. Stokes
and other evidence, sheriff's officers testified that they attempted to use an intoxilyzer to measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
and other evidence, sheriff's officers testified that they attempted to use an intoxilyzer to measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, were removed from the mall, put into a police transport wagon, and taken to the Racine County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40041 - 2009-09-01
, were removed from the mall, put into a police transport wagon, and taken to the Racine County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40041 - 2009-09-01
[PDF]
State v. Thomas G. Martwick
with directions. No. 98-0101-CR 2 Deputy sheriff Brian Roush applied for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13515 - 2017-09-21
with directions. No. 98-0101-CR 2 Deputy sheriff Brian Roush applied for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
point sheriff’s deputies arrived and took Rugg into custody. One of the deputies searched Rugg
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
point sheriff’s deputies arrived and took Rugg into custody. One of the deputies searched Rugg
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06