Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3471 - 3480 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Sonia M. Heinz v. United Services Automobile Association
thus reverse the trial court’s order granting the insurance company summary declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15339 - 2017-09-21
thus reverse the trial court’s order granting the insurance company summary declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15339 - 2017-09-21
State v. John Lee Doll
right to counsel when the trial court answered questions from the jury without consulting with counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16326 - 2005-03-31
right to counsel when the trial court answered questions from the jury without consulting with counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Following a court trial, Matthew Tyler appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148976 - 2017-09-21
) Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Following a court trial, Matthew Tyler appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
maintains that he is entitled to a new trial based on trial counsel’s ineffective assistance. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210679 - 2018-04-11
maintains that he is entitled to a new trial based on trial counsel’s ineffective assistance. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210679 - 2018-04-11
State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it imposed a DNA surcharge. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27
the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it imposed a DNA surcharge. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying his motion and supplemental motion for postconviction relief. Parchman argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36990 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion and supplemental motion for postconviction relief. Parchman argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36990 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court[2] erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied him an evidentiary hearing to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06
that the trial court[2] erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied him an evidentiary hearing to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
WI APP 6
issues. Ultimately, we affirm the trial court in all respects. ¶2 The first issue concerns a party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44117 - 2014-09-15
issues. Ultimately, we affirm the trial court in all respects. ¶2 The first issue concerns a party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶1 PER CURIAM. Jovan T. Mull appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=477834 - 2022-02-01
¶1 PER CURIAM. Jovan T. Mull appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=477834 - 2022-02-01