Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34711 - 34720 of 86921 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Biaya Untuk Renovasi Rumah Type 36 2 Lantai Sederhana Laweyan Solo.

State v. Sir S. M. L.
(15) (2003-04).[2] Sir S.M.L. argues the § 938.34(15) requirement to provide a DNA sample, as applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19779 - 2005-09-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907111 - 2025-01-30

[PDF] State v. Paul Bickler
2 Bickler’s postconviction proceedings and entered the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12242 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
board, and denied No. 2014AP1512 2 costs to the Board. We affirm those parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald D. Shampo
with the procedural mandates of WIS. No. 03-0162-CR 2 STAT. § 971.08 1 resulted in a defective plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19

Rock Co. DHS v. Bonnie L.
16, 2004, and December 22, 2004, was not in compliance with Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2). We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20636 - 2005-12-14

COURT OF APPEALS
consistent with Wis. Stat. § 82.11(2).[1] BACKGROUND ¶2 Thomas and Sandra Jorns purchased a forty-acre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143684 - 2015-06-29

State v. Felicia J.
within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 48.415(6) (2001-02);[2] and (2) there was a substantial likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6389 - 2005-03-31

State v. Felicia J.
within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 48.415(6) (2001-02);[2] and (2) there was a substantial likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6390 - 2005-03-31

Raquel R. S. and K.B. v. Necedah Area School District
, and therefore their duties were ministerial, not discretionary; and (2) the known danger exception to immunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5037 - 2005-03-31