Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34711 - 34720 of 63537 for records.
Search results 34711 - 34720 of 63537 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
stopped Land and placed him under arrest. Land was then handcuffed. ¶14 Based upon this record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76968 - 2012-01-24
stopped Land and placed him under arrest. Land was then handcuffed. ¶14 Based upon this record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76968 - 2012-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Coerper
visited Ms. VandenWyngaard at her home and spoke with her. Ms. VandenWyngaard recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16955 - 2017-09-21
visited Ms. VandenWyngaard at her home and spoke with her. Ms. VandenWyngaard recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16955 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L.C.
. On November 17, 1994, we stayed the appeal and remanded the record to the trial court for a Machner hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8112 - 2005-03-31
. On November 17, 1994, we stayed the appeal and remanded the record to the trial court for a Machner hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
5 Count Two: By representing himself to the USPTO as an attorney of record in Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205999 - 2017-12-21
5 Count Two: By representing himself to the USPTO as an attorney of record in Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205999 - 2017-12-21
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
, we note that the record is unclear as to whether Wodenjak made this inquiry before or during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
, we note that the record is unclear as to whether Wodenjak made this inquiry before or during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶12 As such, our review entails an “independent review of the record,” while “giv[ing] deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
. ¶12 As such, our review entails an “independent review of the record,” while “giv[ing] deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
State v. Paul L. Vogel
and not his third offense. We affirm because a review of the record from the LaCrosse county proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31
and not his third offense. We affirm because a review of the record from the LaCrosse county proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31
Badger State Bank v. Roger A. Taylor
to the analysis under § 242.05(1). Our reading of the statutory language, and our review of the record on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6288 - 2005-03-31
to the analysis under § 242.05(1). Our reading of the statutory language, and our review of the record on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6288 - 2005-03-31
Eldon Boddie v. David H. Schwarz
that he would have made bail on the new charges, and the record is silent on the issue.[2] If Boddie had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11271 - 2005-03-31
that he would have made bail on the new charges, and the record is silent on the issue.[2] If Boddie had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11271 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court o...
sentencing discretion is demonstrated if the record shows that the court “examined the facts and stated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27139 - 2006-11-13
sentencing discretion is demonstrated if the record shows that the court “examined the facts and stated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27139 - 2006-11-13