Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34721 - 34730 of 39998 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 34721 - 34730 of 39998 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, recorded statements, and transcripts of prior hearings to satisfy its burden. Id. ¶17 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542371 - 2022-07-12
, recorded statements, and transcripts of prior hearings to satisfy its burden. Id. ¶17 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542371 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
who first interjected gang-related evidence in the case. During his opening statement, Butler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14
who first interjected gang-related evidence in the case. During his opening statement, Butler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against James and Sholar were initially dismissed when statements Sholar had given were suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196687 - 2017-09-21
against James and Sholar were initially dismissed when statements Sholar had given were suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there were “a lot of communications between the parties,” some of which corroborated Mains’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
that there were “a lot of communications between the parties,” some of which corroborated Mains’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Leroy Beilke
sentencing factor. We affirm. BACKGROUND We adopt the following statement of facts from our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12430 - 2017-09-21
sentencing factor. We affirm. BACKGROUND We adopt the following statement of facts from our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12430 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darin C. Anderson
,” and “there was no forcing or causing by the defendant.” The court made a statement effectively adopting Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5768 - 2017-09-19
,” and “there was no forcing or causing by the defendant.” The court made a statement effectively adopting Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent because she did not understand the circuit court’s statements about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent because she did not understand the circuit court’s statements about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
State v. Christa Brojanac
of the interior of the car confirmed Brojanac’s statement that she was alone. The car had bucket seats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2963 - 2017-09-19
of the interior of the car confirmed Brojanac’s statement that she was alone. The car had bucket seats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2963 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in, Glinski made a statement suggesting that Young now wanted to represent himself. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195019 - 2017-09-21
in, Glinski made a statement suggesting that Young now wanted to represent himself. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195019 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the quoted statement in the preceding paragraph, Bogenschneider contends that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103342 - 2017-09-21
on the quoted statement in the preceding paragraph, Bogenschneider contends that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103342 - 2017-09-21