Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34721 - 34730 of 44710 for part.
Search results 34721 - 34730 of 44710 for part.
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
., provides in part: [N]o civil action or civil proceeding may be brought against any state officer, employe[e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
., provides in part: [N]o civil action or civil proceeding may be brought against any state officer, employe[e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a substantial part. That the circuit court mentioned other instances of abuse does not undermine the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105183 - 2017-09-21
a substantial part. That the circuit court mentioned other instances of abuse does not undermine the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105183 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ventae Parrow
. Background. Parrow pled guilty to two counts of retail theft, as part of a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
. Background. Parrow pled guilty to two counts of retail theft, as part of a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
County of Green Lake v. Paul J. Mertz
to be posted” and provides in part: The speed limit specified in [§ 346.57] (4)(g) and (k) is not effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
to be posted” and provides in part: The speed limit specified in [§ 346.57] (4)(g) and (k) is not effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
in part: (3) Standards for modification or prohibition if move or removal contested. (a) 1. Except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
in part: (3) Standards for modification or prohibition if move or removal contested. (a) 1. Except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Plymouth Glass are in privity. While we cannot verify that the glass panels were part of 2671 LLC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63179 - 2011-04-26
and Plymouth Glass are in privity. While we cannot verify that the glass panels were part of 2671 LLC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63179 - 2011-04-26
Michelle L. Peters v. Joseph A. Peters
that this was an “arbitrary, subjective” valuation on his part. ¶7 On cross-examination, Zoeller was asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2013-02-25
that this was an “arbitrary, subjective” valuation on his part. ¶7 On cross-examination, Zoeller was asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2013-02-25
State v. Kenneth W. Raush
for enhancing drunk driving penalties because of prior conduct is contained in § 343.307, Stats.; part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10787 - 2013-02-25
for enhancing drunk driving penalties because of prior conduct is contained in § 343.307, Stats.; part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10787 - 2013-02-25
Krist Oil Co., Inc. v. City of Ashland
the ordinance, which reads in part as follows: "No retail class 'A' or 'B' intoxicating liquor license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10200 - 2005-03-31
the ordinance, which reads in part as follows: "No retail class 'A' or 'B' intoxicating liquor license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Gallagher
intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person’s body or of any object into the genital or anal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4928 - 2017-09-19
intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person’s body or of any object into the genital or anal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4928 - 2017-09-19