Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34731 - 34740 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 34731 - 34740 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 24, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28767 - 2007-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 24, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28767 - 2007-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 7, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96308 - 2013-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 7, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96308 - 2013-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103820 - 2013-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103820 - 2013-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91968 - 2013-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91968 - 2013-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32006 - 2008-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32006 - 2008-03-05
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16323 - 2005-03-31
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16321 - 2017-09-21
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16323 - 2017-09-21
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16323 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16322 - 2017-09-21
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16322 - 2017-09-21